Saturday, March 14, 2020
Darkness at Noon Revision Notes Essays Darkness at Noon Revision Notes Essay Darkness at Noon Revision Notes Essay Why does Nikolai Rubashov confess to offenses against the revolution that he has non committed? What are the political options open to Rubashov following his apprehension? Which option does he take? Are the deductions of the political statement in Arthur KoesterÃ¢â¬â¢s Darkness at Noon anti-revolutionary or simply anti-Stalinist? Is Darkness at Noon an effort to explicate why the Russian Revolution in peculiar failed or is it an effort to explicate why all revolutions that rely on violent agencies to accomplish their terminals must neglect? What is the cardinal political statement of Arthur KoestlerÃ¢â¬â¢s Darkness at Noon? What are the political deductions of his statement? Outline the most of import differences in the political outlook of RubashovÃ¢â¬â¢s interrogators- Ivanov and Gletkin? What political options are unfastened to Rubashov after he is arrested? Following RubashovÃ¢â¬â¢s arrest Ivanov gave the option of traveling through a public test by squealing to certain Acts of the Apostless. or holding a private administrative test. Public test: * This could take to the discrediting and weakening of the political orientation * Rubashov held a high place within the party. and for him to be seen as a dissenter would hold stirred other revolutionists * Would hold made it more hard for the party to discredit his positions if Rubashov did non publicly denounce himself * DoesnÃ¢â¬â¢t serve the revolution * Preserves his ain honor in some ways but is of no usage to the greater good Confess: * Rubashov capitulates in order to function the revolution and the party * Although he was non guilty of anything. he can non happen any ground in his ain head non to capitulate. Rubashov has been a animal of the party for his whole life. and now the party demands that he should squeal * Justice and nonsubjective truth have ceased to hold any significance for him * He feels superior to his Czarist officer who inhabits the following cell. demoing the differences in thought procedures from a individual ingrained with the party political orientation versus the bourgeoisÃ¢â¬â¢ angle who would continue his honor * The officer believes that honor is about making what you think is right. an individualist position. where as Rubashov contends that to continue the honor of the regime/revolution is more honorable. Ideology dictates the actions of all participants in the government Ã¢â¬â citizen and province To function the revolution. Rubashov finds it necessary to capitulate Ã¢â¬â serves the greater good Ã¢â¬â it is better to squeal to offenses non committed than to put on the line the repute of the revolution for his ain honor Ã¢â¬â grammatical fiction: there is no I. This is a presentation of the corruptness of revolutions enacted through violent agencies. The means donÃ¢â¬â¢t warrant the terminals when the citizens are being overlooked Ã¢â¬â the revolution is supposed to move for the good of the people. but the political orientation has become corrupted to function the good of itself and its leader. Sketch the most of import differences in the political outlook of RubashovÃ¢â ¬â¢s interrogators- Ivanov and Gletkin? Ivanov * He lived before the revolution. and was an rational who helped convey approximately and function the revolution * He is non a adult male of force Ã¢â¬â would prefer to carry Rubashov instead than crush him. Coercion is a last resort for him. but if it is necessary. he believes that the terminals do warrant the agencies. Gletkin * Gletkin is of the 2nd coevals of the revolution. He comes from a provincial background. is non an rational. Rubashov thinks of him as little more than a violent hood. * His political positions are hence those of the party. he accepts what is force fed to him without believing critically about it. * He is a adult male of force. He wants to crush and torment Rubashov to obtain his confession. Therefore he doesnÃ¢â¬â¢t believe in the thought of persuasion. However this does demo that he believes the terminal justifies the agencies. * Gletkin is the apogee of what Koestler argues went incorrect with the revolution Ã¢â¬â he represents totalitarian idea. and he is the sort of single that it produces. * born without an umbilical cordÃ¢â¬â¢
Thursday, February 27, 2020
Free Trade Zones in UAE and Economic Development - Research Paper Example This paper focuses on two companies only i.e. Abu Dhabi Airport Free Zone and Dubai Media City Free Zone. Abu Dhabi Airport Free Zone (ADAFZ) Positive Contributions to the UAE The Abu Dhabi Airport Free Zone is a business and logistics park which is being established by the Abu Dhabi Airports Company (ADAC). The creation of ADAFZ is a milestone for Abu Dhabi to globally establish itself as a leading business centre.Ã Expansion of the airport will enable passenger traffic to shoot from the current 7 million to over 40 million per year. Cargo capacity will also be boosted to two million tons from the current 150,000 tons per year. (Ameifo.com, 2011). According to uaefz.com, multiple business ventures are being established ranging from logistics, aviation and aerospace, consultancy, business development, computing and information technology, electronics, express transport, medical equipment and pharmaceuticals. Various amenities have been put together under one roof and conveniently i ntegrated to provide the best services for investors (Jumeiraconsultants.com, 2011).Ã The free trade zone provides the locals with better goods at subsidized prices hence boosting the economy. The cheapness of goods is usually as a result of cheap production costs in addition to cheap imported labor. The UAE is freed of re-tasking its resources and instead focuses on its comparative advantages. ADAFZ and other free trade zones function as economic laboratories, which allow UAE governments, to learn what will be most beneficial to their economies over a long time (Ehow.com, 2011). Negative Contributions to the UAE Abu Dhabi Airport Free Zone may appear as an equal opportunity for everyone, but, these advantages come along with some disadvantages. The disadvantages extend for UAE is related to the technology level which means that the less industrialized emirates may suffer a disadvantage till they technologically develop. When Abu Dhabi opened its borders to the other emirates to be in the same free trade zone, it also invited fierce competition as well. This means that the whole of UAE competes with one another (Uaefz.com, 2011). The free trade area may also economically develop the area around the airport more than other regions in Abu Dhabi and UAE as a whole. This region may attract more foreign investors than other regions which may lead to economic underdevelopment of some other areas in the free trade zone. The underdevelopment may also impact the Abu DhabiÃ¢â¬â¢s (Ehow.com, 2011). The issue of opening of borders brings the challenge of corporations seeking out for the lowest labor and environmental standards in order to minimize its production costs hence pressuring for low working standards. Furthermore, the transparency and absence of strict regulations of ADAFZ make it an attraction for illicit investors to launder crime proceeds and maybe finance terrorism (Fatf-gafi.org, 2011). Benefits to Investors According to Abu Dhabi (2011) an investor ha s to lease the facility in
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Homeland Security - Essay Example This essay, this reaction paper, will argue that these terms need to be defined very specifically and very deliberately; otherwise, it persists as a vague concept capable of being used as justification for nearly any action. More specifically, this paper will argue that homeland ought to be defined to include a variety of harmonious interests and that security ought to be defined as actions and policies designed to accomplish their objectives with the least amount of intrusion into the affairs of individual states and into the lives of individuals or businesses. As an initial matter, homeland should include a variety of interests; more particularly, it should refer to the nation, the states, and to individuals. There should be no ranking of these homeland types in terms of significance; that means that national interests should not be placed above state interests through this extra-constitutional concept, and that individuals should not be granted a higher status than they are already accorded under traditional notions of constitutional jurisprudence. A framework for allocating powers and rights already exists in the constitution; the mere notion of a recently defined homeland being promulgated in haphazard fashion and zealously guarded sounds forebodingly like an attempt to subvert constitutional principles through non-constitutional means. A great deal has been made about protecting critical homeland sites, such as those related to infrastructure, finance, and military readiness. The homeland also includes lesser constituent parts of the country, such as in Louisiana, which were devastated by the hurricanes recently. There ought to be a uniform approach to defining the homeland, whether is the Pentagon, the Federal Reserve Bank, Louisiana, or Mr. and Mrs. Smith's family farm. My sense, my reaction, is that the homeland portion of the concept prioritizes national aspects while minimizing or ignoring state and individual aspects. This would be a dangerous deviation from the constitutional principles upon which this country was founded; as a result, that would make Homeland Security a direct threat to the system of governance established by the American constitution. In addition, the security aspect of the concept is also vague and seemingly unlimited. Is security meant to be proactive or reactive Is it meant to stifle otherwise protected types of speech and protests in order to prevent some potential negative outcome The Central Intelligence Agency and the American military have traditionally been vested with duties dealing with international affairs. The CIA is no more allowed to spy on American soil than are American soldiers allowed to engage in domestic law enforcement activities. And, yet, as security implies both the gathering of intelligence and the mobilization of physical forces to deter any potential attack, whom else would be involved in maintaining American security if not these organizations This raises troubling issues. Does this notion of security mean
Friday, January 31, 2020
Haunted House Essay In the town of Blakeslee, Arkansas, there was a house that everyone knew was haunted. It was an old neglected house on a side street in the oldest part of town. Sometimes, the most wonderful smells issued from the house and filled the street with the heavenly odor of fresh baked bread. Whenever that happened, people would say that the old house must have been a bakery or, at the very least, the former home of a fabulous baker. Sometimes, the neighbors would hear the sound of music and laughter coming from the empty house as if there was a wonderful party in full swing. Whenever that happened, the neighbors would look at each other and say, Ã¢â¬Å"It sounds like a nice party, I wish I was invited. Ã¢â¬ Whatever ghosts haunted the old house, they were benign and friendly ghosts. But even the friendliest spirits are scary and no one ever actually went inside the house. With the possible exception of a young boy being dared by his playmates, no one ever even stepped foot on the front porch. One day a man moved into town from a distant city. He saw the empty house and asked the neighbors, Ã¢â¬Å"who owned it? He was told the owner was unknown and that the property could be bought for back taxes. No one told the stranger about the houseÃ¢â¬â¢s curious history. The man went to City Hall and purchased the property. Soon after moving in, however, strange things began to happenÃ¢â¬â odd noises in the night, weird lights drifting from room to room, the smells of baking from a cold kitchen and, worst of all, the sound of a party when the new owners were trying to sleep. After a few days, the manÃ¢â¬â¢s wife declared that she could no longer live in so haunted a place and moved out taking the children with her. Before long, the man gave up as well. He was forced to find another place to live but he was angry at the neighbors for not warning him about the houseÃ¢â¬â¢s reputation. He was angry at the town board for not telling him that the house was occupied by ghosts. In fact he was angry at everyone in town for treating him so badly. So he went to the mayor to complain and see if he could get his money back. The mayor refused saying he never misrepresented the house as anything it was not. Ã¢â¬Å"Just because a house is haunted,Ã¢â¬ he said, Ã¢â¬Å"doesnÃ¢â¬â¢t mean you canÃ¢â¬â¢t live there. The trick is making friends with the ghosts, learning to get along with them. Ã¢â¬ So the man went to the Pastor of the local church and told him his problem. The Pastor said, Ã¢â¬Å"YouÃ¢â¬â¢ve been in town for a month and only now, when youÃ¢â¬â¢re having a problem, do you come and see me? Well, sit down and tell me whatÃ¢â¬â¢s on your mind. Ã¢â¬ So the man sat and told the Pastor about the haunted house heÃ¢â¬â¢d bought. Now the Pastor in this village was considered a wise man, set in his ways, conservative in his manner and beliefs. He wasnÃ¢â¬â¢t open to new ideas but, reluctantly, he agreed to visit the house and see exactly what the man was talking about. The Pastor accompanied the man to the house. As they approached the block the house was on, the PastorÃ¢â¬â¢s smelled a delicious smell. Ã¢â¬Å"WhatÃ¢â¬â¢s that wonderful smell? Ã¢â¬ he asked. Ã¢â¬Å"ItÃ¢â¬â¢s the ghosts baking bread,Ã¢â¬ the man replied. When they got closer, the Pastor stopped to listen. He turned to the man and inquired, Ã¢â¬Å"I hear music. Is someone having a party? Ã¢â¬ Ã¢â¬Å"ItÃ¢â¬â¢s the ghosts having a party,Ã¢â¬ replied the man. They went inside and looked around the empty house. The Pastor sat at a table while the man looked for something to serve his guest. He found an old bottle of whiskey and poured a glass for the Pastor and one for himself. They toasted each others health and drank. Ã¢â¬Å"So you moved from Little Rock to Blakeslee? Ã¢â¬ said the Pastor. Ã¢â¬Å"My parents live in Little Rock, I know the town well. Ã¢â¬ The man, it turned out, knew some of the PastorÃ¢â¬â¢s relatives. They talked and joked about those things they had in common and felt a friendship growing. They were having such a pleasant time that before they knew it, three hours had passed. They were gone so long, the manÃ¢â¬â¢s wife began to get nervous. Ã¢â¬Å"He went to the PastorÃ¢â¬â¢s house hours ago,Ã¢â¬ she said to herself. Ã¢â¬Å"Maybe the ghosts got him. Ã¢â¬ So she picked herself up and went to the PastorÃ¢â¬â¢s house and introduced herself to the PastorÃ¢â¬â¢s wife. Together they pooled their misgivings about ghosts and their worries about their husbands and went to the haunted house together. They peeked in the windows and saw the two men sitting at a table drinking , laughing and having a good time. The wives joined their husbands and found that they had much to talk about. The laughing and talking attracted the neighbors who stopped by and introduced themselves. Pretty soon the kitchen was filled with the smell of cooking. A neighbor brought his fiddle and another brought his guitar. And just like that, there was a party. The old house filled with real smells and real laughter. It was alive again and that, of course, was what it wanted all along. From that day to this, the old house came alive again and its ghosts were laid to rest never to be seen or heard of again. I thought to myself that was really scary.
Thursday, January 23, 2020
Although the cold war has ended and the Soviet Union has disbanded, there is still a need of intelligence collection for the United States. Finding itself as the leader of the rest of the world, the United States must prepare to identify problems as they arise, the earlier the detection, the more likelihood for success. With any one intelligence agency having too much information, problems could arise; therefore, it is imperative to keep a close watchful eye on these agencies to ensure that personal rights are not infringed upon. The success of intelligence gathering agencies is hard to determine. It is difficult to argue that covert operations had much of an impact on the outcome of the cold war (Nutter), but the cold war was not and is not the only objective for intelligence agencies. In fact, since the cold war the intelligence agencies of the United States have accomplished several tasks set before them; for instance, assisting other countries in identifying terrorists like Carlos the Jackal in Sudan, the head of the Shining Path in Peru, and the ring leader of the World Trade Center Bombing in the Philippines. As the leader of the world in the 21ST century, the United States intelligence agencies must keep up this highest level of information gathering procedures in order to stay ahead of any upcoming problems down the road. With intelligence gathering operations being utilized as collection assets on embassies of opposing nations based in the United States, careful consideration must be used when working so close with the American public. Everyday information that may appear irrelevant could be very valuable to domestic or foreign-based companies for advertising campaigns, marketing forecasts, and price gouging. This type of information leakage is a violation of an AmericanÃ¢â¬â¢s rights. One problem with having so much information at home and abroad is seeing the correct way to solve dilemmas before they occur. While in war actions of questionable ethics often go unanswered and are hardly given a second thought. In 1941 when the Czech military intelligence service approached the British Special Operations Executive for assistance in an assassination of a German SS Officer no questions were raised, not even about who the target maybe (Richelson). With any agency possessing too much knowledge internally, it may choose to take the short road to ensure success of a mission. Thus, the American public should support the United States intelligence agencies, but keep a close watchful eye on them as well.
Tuesday, January 14, 2020
The movie entitled Ã¢â¬Å"Killer of SheepÃ¢â¬ by Charles Burnett in 1977 made a significant footprint in the movie world. Though it was a low-budgeted movie, it won the first prize at Berlin Festival in 1981. This movie is all about Stan and his family as they struggle their life with financial and emotional problems. Stand works in a slaughterhouse to make his family live. It is a simple yet attackable story because it shows reality in the society. Many of us work hard but less opportunities. The only thing that Stan felt happy is when he dances with his wife and hold his daughterÃ¢â¬â¢s hands.There are only six characters and one significant setting in the story, which means that the movie is an independent film. All the characters are connected with one another as they reveal their characterizations in the beginning of the story and donate their thoughts and perception of society as the movie ends. I can say that it is an advocacy film though it has no solution in the end. As it shows the life of many people like Stan and his family, the director depicts that present situation of the society that needs to be taken care of. The movie shows that Stan is already numb with his life as a slaughter because he knows that he could not able to give his family a better life. His wife is also a weak person who used to depend on Stan as the provider of the family, which made the movie more dramatic and realistic.As an audience, it is an eye-opener to the public of the situation and life of people during 1970s. It made me realize that people like Stan tried to be contented with their life as they anesthetized themselves from their situation to make their bodies work and think only for the betterment of their family even with no luxury and lesser necessities.Work CitedBurnett, Charles. Killer of Sheep. 1977.
Monday, January 6, 2020
Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 773 Downloads: 9 Date added: 2019/06/24 Category History Essay Level High school Topics: Gilgamesh Essay Did you like this example? While reading Gilgamesh, I was struck by the similarities between the story being told and that of the stories compiled within the Bible. The correlations between the two made me question whether or not Gilgamesh somehow influenced the creation of certain narratives within the religion I practice today. It is interesting to read something that potentially helped fashion Christianity into what it has become over the centuries. I can see the influence of Gilgamesh in quite a few places in the Bible, including but not limited to, the creation of Adam, the corruption of Adam, and the great flood. When I was little, the first story I remember being told in church centered around Adam and Eve, specifically their creation. I never questioned the validity of the story, nor did I ponder its origins. To me, if it was in the Bible, then it must be true. While reading Gilgamesh, it was almost like I was transported back into my old Sunday school class. Enkidu, Gilgameshs best friend, is created by the goddess Aruru. She moistened her hands, she pinched off some clay, she threw it into the wilderness, kneaded it, shaped it to her idea, and fashioned a man (Mitchell 74). In the Bible, God creates Adam, who is the first man on Earth. And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life (Bible 2). Both of these powerful beings create a man from an idea and use nature to mold him into formation. To top it all off, both of these deities thrust their newly formed, pure, and ignorant beings into places that can easily be described as paradis e on Earth. DonÃ¢â¬â¢t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Gilgamesh and the Bible" essay for you Create order In addition to the creation of Adam, the Bible seems to also mimic the corruption of Enkidu when it details the deception that leads to Adam and Eves enlightenment. In the garden, Adam and Eve live a simple life devoid of the knowledge of sin. The couples ignorance of sin is represented by their nakedness. And they were both naked, the man and his wife, and were not ashamed (Bible 3). In Gilgamesh, Enkidu roamed all over the wilderness, naked, far from the cities of men (Mitchell 75). His innocence is also represented in his nakedness. Adam is corrupted when he listens to his wife, Eve, and eats from the tree of knowledge. Enkidu is corrupted when he has sexual intercourse with a priestess named Ishtar. The characters are stripped of their innocence after being tempted and deceived by females. Furthermore, both females actions are being manipulated in different ways by other characters. Despite the reasoning behind the deceptions, Enkidu and Adam can never reclaim what they have lost . Enkidu is no longer accepted by the animals that raised him and Adam is cast out of the garden. Finally, perhaps the most glaring similarity between the Bible and Gilgamesh is that of a world-wide flood. In the Bible, there is a flood that lasts for forty days and forty nights and wipes out all life on Earth. And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man (Bible 9). In Gilgamesh, a similar flood occurs and eradicates practically all of civilization. There was no life at all. The human race had turned into clay (Mitchell 187). Characters in both stories avoid dying by building a large ship. In addition to this, both characters build such a vessel because they were instructed how to by a higher power at play. In conclusion, there are many similarities between the Bible and Gilgamesh. The stories show how Gods create life and also interfere in it. Examining whether or not Gilgamesh did influence the creation of the Bible is a lofty feat that I wish I could delve deeper into. Gilgamesh is described as, the oldest story in the world, a thousand years older than the Iliad or the Bible (Mitchell 1). Its influence is spread throughout the stories we hear and tell ourselves, even today. Whether we talk about the creation of Adam and Eve or watch a film with Chris Evans depicting Captain America, themes from Gilgamesh are present within the narratives. However, if Gilgamesh existed thousands of years ago, is it not safe to wager that other stories also existed? Is it plausible that other stories remain hidden, waiting to be unearthed? Reading this story not only helped me see the similarities between this enticing tale and the Bible, but it also helped me see connections between this ancient text and that of the modern world.